On 25 April 2012 17:06, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Łukasz Czerwiński <milimet...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I have never ever get an email from Google Code. I have just checked
> > that triple. That's the reason for ignoring your comments. I'm sorry
> > that my new patch made you run your tests twice to give me the same
> > list of errors...
> >
> > Do you run tests for each patch uploaded to Rietveld?
>
> I won't any more. It is high time somebody else pitches in. Neither my
> computing power nor my personality make me suitable for that job.
>
I see... Unfortunately I won't be any help in that.
> > Ok, thank you. But compiling and running regtests took approx. 2.5
> > hours. It's very long...
>
> Half of that is setting the baseline. It should be somewhat less: I
> think it took about 2 hours on my previous laptop (10 years old). When
> it broke down, another senior developer sent me the money for a model
> that is 5 years old (Intel Core 2 Duo at 1.8GHz). A full comparison
> including baseline is now something short of 40 minutes (if there are
> several patches in the queue, only a single baseline gets made). Pretty
> much every other developer has more powerful hardware available: some
> even has been explicitly bought for LilyPond work, and the fully
> automated tests for pushing to master, quite more expensive than the
> patch testing, are run on such a system.
>
I run that on a virtual machine which makes it slower and it uses one core
instead of two, so it's slower again... I will think of using native
Ubuntu, but I really like working using Windows 7, so that will be hard
choice :)
Should I take in account diffs that got printed after make check?
They look like this:
(...)
+++ out/voice-5-midi.ly 2012-04-25 16:24:51.779884744 +0200
@@ -10,14 +10,8 @@
\consists "Completion_rest_engraver"
}
}
-\midi {
- \context {
- \Score
- midiChannelMapping = #'instrument
- }
-}
-% included from ./out-www/voice-5.header
+% included from ./out/voice-5.header
\header {
texidoc="midi2ly still produces output for a staff with five voices.
However, in such cases, most probably the the correct \voiceOne,
\voiceX... mapping is lost."
options=""
@@ -43,39 +37,71 @@ trackA = <<
>>
-trackBchannelA = \relative c {
- \voiceOne
+trackBchannelA = {
+
+ \set Staff.instrumentName = "trackB:voiceA"
+
+}
+
+trackBchannelB = {
+ \skip 1
+ | % 2
+
+ \set Staff.instrumentName = "trackB:voiceE"
+
+}
+
+trackBchannelC = {
- \set Staff.instrumentName = ":1"
+ \set Staff.instrumentName = "trackB:voiceD"
+
+}
+
+trackBchannelD = {
+
+ \set Staff.instrumentName = "trackB:voiceC"
+
+}
+
+trackBchannelE = {
+
+ \set Staff.instrumentName = "trackB:voiceB"
+
+}
+
+trackBchannelF = \relative c {
+ \voiceOne
<c''' a >2 b
| % 2
}
-trackBchannelB = \relative c {
+trackBchannelG = \relative c {
\voiceThree
c''4. d8 e4 f
| % 2
}
-trackBchannelC = \relative c {
+trackBchannelH = \relative c {
\voiceFour
d'1
| % 2
}
-trackBchannelD = \relative c {
+trackBchannelI = \relative c {
\voiceTwo
c'4 c2 c4
| % 2
}
-trackBchannelE = \relative c {
- s1 d1
+trackBchannelJ = \relative c {
+ r1
| % 2
+ d
+ | % 3
}
@@ -85,6 +111,11 @@ trackB = <<
\context Voice = voiceC \trackBchannelC
\context Voice = voiceD \trackBchannelD
\context Voice = voiceE \trackBchannelE
+ \context Voice = voiceF \trackBchannelF
+ \context Voice = voiceG \trackBchannelG
+ \context Voice = voiceH \trackBchannelH
+ \context Voice = voiceI \trackBchannelI
+ \context Voice = voiceJ \trackBchannelJ
>>
Łukasz
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
