On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:16:12 -0800, Keith OHara <k-ohara5...@oco.net> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 23:57:22 -0800, <m...@apollinemike.com> wrote:
I think that you're right for most cases, but for a piece with lots of
accidentals that could potentially hang over barlines, this complexity
in estimation seems to help.
Have an example where pure-from-neighbor would do better than
axis-group-interface:height ?
Well I can't seem to get axis-group-interface:height to work for BarLines at
all.
I must not understand how SpanBars used to work.
I expect that occasionally, this patch will let a collision with a span
bar leak through, but it would be something crazy like an \espressivo atop
a \downbow on a note connected to a cross-staff slur. The \espressivo
isn't pure-relevant because of the cross-staff poisoning.
This doesn't look too bad. At most it slightly increases the incidence of
cross-staff collisions
\new GrandStaff <<
\new Staff = "up" {
g'1 \noBreak g'1 \noBreak g'1 }
\new Staff = "down" {
g'1 g'1 e''2_\(\portato\espressivo
\change Staff="up" f'2\) } >>
The espressivo is generally disrespected in spacing. If we turn the g's in the
upper staff into gs, the last of them hits the espressivo.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
