http://codereview.appspot.com/5323062/diff/39005/lily/pure-from-neighbor-engraver.cc File lily/pure-from-neighbor-engraver.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5323062/diff/39005/lily/pure-from-neighbor-engraver.cc#newcode60 lily/pure-from-neighbor-engraver.cc:60: pure_relevants_.push_back (i.item ()); It seems that pure_relevants_[] are the grobs that have the pure-from-neighbor interface, which would be the BarLines, Clefs, SpanBarStubs etc. This is a disjoint set from item_[]. All of item_[] satisfy (pure-relevant? x) Not all of pure_relevants_[] satisfy (pure-relevant? x) The variable naming is evil. http://codereview.appspot.com/5323062/diff/39005/scm/define-grobs.scm File scm/define-grobs.scm (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/5323062/diff/39005/scm/define-grobs.scm#newcode1743 scm/define-grobs.scm:1743: (pure-from-neighbor-ignore . #t) Scripts can be wide enough to hit span bars. What good does pure-from-neighbor-ignore do ? The behavior is surprising. Playing with the example you gave earlier : \new GrandStaff << \new Staff R1*5 \new Staff { \override TextScript #'extra-spacing-width = ##f dis4 dis dis dis^"sliding-over" | dis4 dis dis dis | dis'''4 dis dis dis^"sliding-over-not" | R1 c'''4\espressivo a'2. } >> http://codereview.appspot.com/5323062/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
