On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:14:26PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > An afterthought, however: we do have an inordinate amount of user-level > commands that need to be called from Scheme rather than with Lilypond > syntax. That does not make sense. Void music functions have been > around for eternities, just a bit inconvenient to define, but reasonably > documented. > > Maybe we need a user interface meister that tries to maintain a bit of > coherency and sanity when new features get added.
I've been looking for one since mid-2008. Don't hold your breath. I think the best chance for this is GLISS. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
