What would people prefer for creating a Lilypond function that returns an "unspecified" value (what the Guile read-eval-print loop takes as a hint to print nothing at all) and is called for its side effect?
define-void-function or define-procedure? The first is a bit more C-ish, the second more Pascal-ish. I am not going to consider define-subroutine though. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
