Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> writes: > On 10/19/11 3:26 AM, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> >>\void #(hashq-set! ...) >>\void #(hashq-set! ...) >> >>rather than >> >>\ignore #(hashq-set! ...) >>\ignore #(hashq-set! ...) >> >>It's a bit C-ish, but not all that bad, and it fits with >>define-void-function. > > \returnUnspecified #(hashq-set! ...) > > \scmUnspecified #(hashq-set! ...) > > \ignoreReturn #(hashq-set! ...) > > After all I can think of, I think \void is probably the best.
I am not enthused about this particular consequence of auto-exporting Scheme expressions. I currently don't see a better way of handling it, and it has flagged more bad code than false positives when I tried it. But I would be quite surprised if it did not trigger regressions with existing previously valid and reasonable code. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
