On 8/27/11 6:45 AM, "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" <jann...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes: > >>> However, almost always it is Much Better (TM) to use the benchmarking >>> approach: find how the great masters solved the situation and program >>> LilyPond to do that. Is this documented somewhere, by the way? >> >> Sorry, i don't understand: do you say that we should use layer >> workaround, don't use it, or something else? > > No, I'm not arguing for a certain technical solution, I'm saying that > instead of deciding amongst ourselves what solution to implement, it > would be better to let the great masters decide. "Just" mimick what > they did. But in this case, this is arguing against the layer workaround as a solution to this problem. The great masters did not engrave a ledger line, then engrave an accidental with whiteout. They engraved a shorter ledger line. This shorter ledger line had rounded ends. The whiteout solution gives a short ledger line, but with square ends. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
