2011/8/23 Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org>: > To pull that to a meta-level: sometimes it makes sense to program > LilyPond to do that which is obvious. > > However, almost always it is Much Better (TM) to use the benchmarking > approach: find how the great masters solved the situation and program > LilyPond to do that. Is this documented somewhere, by the way?
Sorry, i don't understand: do you say that we should use layer workaround, don't use it, or something else? 2011/8/23 Keith OHara <k-ohara5...@oco.net>: > Mike Solomon <mikesol <at> ufl.edu> writes: > >> I maintain that the best solution is: >> \override Staff.Accidental #'layer = #-100 >> \override Staff.LedgerLineSpanner #'layer = #-101 >> \override Staff.Accidental #'whiteout = ##t >> >> Which is a trivial change to engravers-init.ly. I'll post a patch later >> today > unless anyone sees a better alternative. > > I wouldn't bother. It would not really fix issue 706, and makes an > exception to the general rule that everything is layer 1, except > the grid of lines is on layer 0. > You could post it as a workaround to issue 706 maybe. +1 cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
