Hi, i'm very interested in this, i've spotted this problem some time ago. Why is this Rietveld issue marked as closed? I'm adding a link in T issue 706 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=706
I've tried it and it ate some ledger lines, but maybe i have dirty
tree. Try this
{ <c'! f!>2 <bis, cis'> <bes, ces'> < ces' des > }
On my machine it eats ledgers, see attachment.
On 2011/08/18 12:51:09, hanwenn wrote:
> It sounds like an optimization that doesn't really improve
> output at all, and performance not by much. Why not skip it
> altogether and avoid the complexity?
I wholeheartedly disagree, i think that this issue isn't negligible
(or did i misunderstood you, Han-Wen?).
If we care about shortening ledgers when there is an accidental, we
should care about doing it properly in case of chords etc.
cheers,
Janek
\version "2.13.43"
{ <c'! f!>2 <bis, cis'> <bes, ces'> < ces' des > }
% ledger lines do not shorten. Also the lower natural should be more to the right
ledger-accidental.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
