Hello, )-----Original Message----- )From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore....@gnu.org )[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore....@gnu.org] On )Behalf Of David Kastrup )Sent: 30 July 2011 17:03 )To: lilypond-devel@gnu.org )Subject: Re: music function semantics ) )Jan Warchoł <lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com> writes: ) )> 2011/7/29 James Lowe <james.l...@datacore.com>: )>> )>> 29 July 2011 08:11 Jan Warchol wrote: )>> )...ah, so it is possible to modify ties in a chord separately! Do )>> you realize )that i didn't know about it? )>> )>> Snippet for LSR? )> )> I tried to write it, and do you know what? It doesn't work! Very stupid. )> )> % if you apply this tweak to first note (c'), it works (tie gets )> weird). However, when applied to second note, it doesn't. )> { < c' ~ g'-\tweak #'control-points #'((1 . -1) (3 . 0.6) (12.5 . )> 0.6) (14.5 . -1)) ~ > q } ) )If you take a look at the output of ) )\displayMusic { < c'-\tweak #'control-points #'((1 . -1) (3 . 0.6) (12.5 . )0.6) (14.5 . -1)) ~ g'-\tweak #'control-points #'((1 . -1) (3 . 0.6) (12.5 . )0.6) (14.5 . -1)) ~ > q } ) )you'll see that it is not the fault of the parser. The music expression still )carries the respective information. ) This is a bit too low level for me now.
So is this a bug or something else? (I.e do we need a tracker item or not?) and can we tie individual notes within in a chord or not? ?:) James _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
