Re: music function semantics

[Carl Sorensen]

On 7/30/11 9:33 AM, "Jan Warchoł" <lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> I see...
> The more i think about it, the more i feel it would be good to merge
> \set, \override and \tweak into one thingy.  Doing so would make music
> functions like above one quite simpler.

While I could see that perhaps we could combine \set and \override, we
cannot combine \tweak.

\override and \set modify everything at the current moment.

\tweak modifies only a single grob.


The distinction between \override and \tweak needs to stay because it is a
semantic distinction.

Thanks,

Carl


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel