2011/7/29 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > Jan Warchoł <lemniskata.bernoulli...@gmail.com> writes: >> if i understood you correctly (it's about the difference in syntax >> between tweak and override?), i agree that it's quite a serious >> problem. > > There is not all that much, really. Take a look at music-functions.scm, > for example style-note-heads. It's sort of polymorphic since it can be > called in various places. It looks at the type of received music > expression in order to figure out where it was called, and does a tweak > or an override depending on what will work in that context.
I see... The more i think about it, the more i feel it would be good to merge \set, \override and \tweak into one thingy. Doing so would make music functions like above one quite simpler. GLISS - i can't wait for you! cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
