On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 00:43 +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > Dear all, > Here are three patches for some features that I implemented during the 2.13 > cycle so far. > > http://codereview.appspot.com/4133044/ > http://codereview.appspot.com/4129053/ > http://codereview.appspot.com/4132045/ > > As I wrote in my other mail to the bug list, I prefer it if the developer > writes some basic documentation, while some dedicated doc writer makes them > readable to normal users. So, please understand these patches as a suggestion > to be improved, not as a final version. > > > Some more patches are yet to come (for pdf metadata, context mods stored as > variable, etc.) > > Cheers, > Reinhold
What would possibly be more useful to doc volunteers, and more productive of developers' time, might be to post a draft, outline, or series of bullet points, probably on bug-, so the doc people can take the patch process from the start. With devs putting doc patches on Reitveldt, at least one doc person isn't sure whether it's a good idea to suggest improvements to the dev who started the patch, and waste more of his time. AIUI, to get out of this situation, Reinhold should revert his patch, and I can then take the content and put it through channels, handling any further work on it, while Reinhold gets back to his work. Colin -- You recognize the tune, but sometimes the fingers just don't work so well. When you're playing you need to listen and know when to back off. - Mark Janak, Class of '78 Aggie Band Reunion 2005 _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
