On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 14:07 +0100, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > > What would possibly be more useful to doc volunteers, and more > > productive of developers' time, might be to post a draft, outline, or > > series of bullet points, probably on bug-, so the doc people can take > > the patch process from the start. With devs putting doc patches on > > Reitveldt, at least one doc person isn't sure whether it's a good idea > > to suggest improvements to the dev who started the patch, and waste more > > of his time. AIUI, to get out of this situation, Reinhold should revert > > his patch, and I can then take the content and put it through channels, > > handling any further work on it, while Reinhold gets back to his work. > > I'm fine with that, too. Can you simply take the patch from rietveld and > improve it, or shall I send them as attachments to bug-lilypond? Or shall I > even push these raw patches so that you (or whoever else wants to improve > them) can work directly on git? > > Cheers, > Reinhold
I'll just take the patches, tweak a bit, and resubmit. I'll rely on James or Trevor to push when the patches are reviewed. Colin -- It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning. - Bill Watterson, comic strip artist (1958- ), in his comic strip Calvin & Hobbes _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
