On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 01:41:45PM +0000, James Lowe wrote: > Where my skill falls down is if the new section names cannot be > moved lock stock and barrel over to the LM and I have to end up > making new nodes. Otherwise I can easily just cut/paste edited > chunks into the existing LM texi/tely files. > > When a decision has been made (do we put this in LM only or > both?) let me know so I don't waste any time by having to > re-correct edits.
Nothing goes in LM only. Let's work on making stuff for Notation. Then, once that's done, if people has a sad about any nice bits from the original patch that were removed, we can consider adding them to Learning. BTW, making new nodes is very simple; try reviewing Reinhold's three doc patches, because one of them adds a @node, and because you should be doing more patch reviewing anyway. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
