This comment of mine from Mark's patch still applies, even after these changes:
I've looked at the compiled version now. It's nicely written, but my concern is that this is no longer written in 'reference' style. To me, parts of it seem more suited to the LM. The idea of the NR is that people already well-familiar with LilyPond can quickly find a keyword or syntax they have forgotten, without having to wade through introductory material. That process was easier with the old layout. I'll not object to this change, but we ought to do it only after explicit agreement from others that this style of writing is acceptable in the NR.
IIRC Carl agreed with this, and suggested reworking it for the LM. Trevor http://codereview.appspot.com/4124056/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
