On Tue 14 Dec 2010, 15:12 Trevor Daniels wrote: > Carl Sorensen wrote Tuesday, December 14, 2010 12:55 PM > > > >On Dec 14, 2010, at 5:45 AM, "Dmytro O. Redchuk" > ><brownian....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>I fail to see why this test (accidental.ly) would be less > >>valuable > >>if there > >>would be "\key c \major", let's say. > >> > > > >Because you want to ensure that it behaves properly. The best fix, > >IMO, would be to add "The first note has a natural followed by a > >sharp" at the beginning of the description. > > +1 > > The test also shows the cancelling natural behaves > properly too- appearing once but only only once in the > bar. A key of C would not show this. You could argue > that this should be in a separate test, but why not > combine them? Well, ok, I would not argue.
ps. 10 posts in this thread -- definitely, something should be changed in test's description, i guess. Probably, i would propose smth like this: "The first note has a sharp, preceeded by a natural (because of key signature). The second note does not get any sign. The third and fourth show forced and cautionary accidentals". -- Dmytro O. Redchuk Bug Squad _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel