"Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> writes: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> > To: <lilypond-devel@gnu.org> > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 11:32 AM > Subject: Re: accidental.ly regtest > > >> "Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> writes: >> >>> This is the accidental.ly regtest: >> >> [...] >> >>> It produces the attached image, which looks rather odd, since it has >>> an accidental of natural-#. I'm guessing that this is because the key >>> sig is flats, and therefore the flat goes to natural before it goes to >>> sharp, but it looked odd to my eye and that of another bug-squadder. >>> Is it correct behaviour? >> >> Totally. This is really standard notation and I am surprised you have >> not yet come across it. > > I guess that having a sharp in a flats key is quite unusual - it looks > like the key sig for the piece is A flat major, and to get an e sharp > you'd have to move to F sharp major, which is quite a movement. > >>> If so, I think it would justify a note in the description, or indeed a >>> change to the regtest to get rid of the key sig entirely. >> >> I fail to see why. > > Well - because it's unusual. Far more common to have a sharp on a > natural note in the key sig, or a natural on a flat, for example.
And a regtest should not test unusual things? I still fail to see why. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
