On 28 October 2010 23:55, Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote: > Well, as far as I can see, Scheme engravers are really engravers, so they > ought to be documented in the IR along with the C++ engravers, not in an > appendix of the NR along with Scheme functions. > > Although the approach you suggest is better than having nothing at all.
I haven't tested Marc's latest patch yet (and I'm sorry this issue didn't cross my mind when I originally suggested using a Scheme engraver), but I don't think Valentin's approach is possible without also changing the doc infrastructure for C++ engravers: I think you'll find \consist-ing a Scheme engraver in engraver-init.ly will cause `make doc' to fail. Cheers, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
