On 10/28/10 1:54 PM, "Marc Hohl" <m...@hohlart.de> wrote: > Am 28.10.2010 14:53, schrieb carl.d.soren...@gmail.com: >> Currently, I view Scheme engravers as a way for users (and snippets) to >> add engraver functionality, but not as an optimal way to add core >> functionality. > > I understand your argument, but I think that it would be better to > include scheme engravers > into the docs before recoding the Tab_tie_follow_engraver in c++. At > least, I cannot cope with this. > Aside from that, I think that more extensions on the scheme side > (including engravers) > are about to come. >
I would *love* to have a way to document Scheme engravers such that we could include them in the docs, but at present I have no knowledge of how to do so. Can anybody shed any light on this? Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
