Am 28.10.2010 20:34, schrieb tdanielsmu...@googlemail.com:
I've not reviewed the code but I share Carl's concern about scheme
engravers if there is no way of documenting them in the IR.  If the
grobs have any user-servicable properties they must be properly
documented.
Ok, I see the point, but in this case, there are only internal properties involved.

More generally, I suspect more scheme engravers to come, so a proper way of getting them
well documented would be fine.

Marc

Trevor


http://codereview.appspot.com/2191042/



_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to