On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 12:15:18AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote: > Graham Percival wrote Tuesday, September 07, 2010 8:14 PM > > >Hmm... I'm not certain about the paper-size and indent. > > Happy to remove paper size and landscape, and book, > but I'd like to keep indent 0 to show the separator > in a more realistic context.
Ok. Alternately, we could have three systems in there? I'm content either way. > >Is that example missing anything important? > > Well, that's pretty well the example that is already > shown in 4.1.2 Other layout variables, so I assumed > you wanted something better as you thought "the current > doc page about page-separator-markup is rather > un-optimal." Sorry, my fault; I was unclear. I was referring to its location, hard-to-find-ness, and being buried in the middle of a long doc section which mostly had nothing to do with the separator mark. > >I suppose it might be > >nice to add a StaffGroup in there rarther than only having a > >single staff... but I think this gets to the heart of the matter. > > Definitely better with a staff group of some sort. > You'd never use a system separator with a single staff. I've seen it done in student compositions... generally because they "couldn't get finale to stop doing it". :) > >I mean, system separators are pretty much on par with StaffGroup > >-- it's something you add to a (large) score to improve > >readability. I'd totally go for a 1.6.1 Separating staves, to > >come at the end fo the current 1.6.1. > > OK, I will move it there. Thanks! Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
