On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 07:09:01PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote: > > Graham Percival wrote Friday, August 27, 2010 9:54 PM > > >I know you didn't say to look at NR 2.1.1, but I noticed that you > >used > >"Common references for vocal music" instead of the standard > >"References for vocal music". > > Yes, this was because there are specific references later. > But I don't feel too strongly about this if you'd really > rather it conform.
I'd rather make it conform; later ones can simply be "References for hymns" and the like. > >I'd > >actually say that 2.1.2 is the only subsection which is common to > >"all" types of vocal music. > > I think we need to reorganise the first few sections > of Vocal a little. > > I suggest the following: > > 2.1 Vocal music > 2.1.1 Common notation for vocal music > (Common) references for vocal music > Entering lyrics (the present Lyrics explained) > [all the sections in Aligning lyrics to a melody > except for Lyrics and repeats] > 2.1.2 Techniques specific to lyrics > [as now, plus:] > Working with lyrics and variables > Lyrics and repeats I like it. You have slightly more inside 2.1.1 than I would have initially guessed, but I've always proclaimed my ignorance of lyrics. If you're content with that change, then I'm happy. > And it removes the problem > of referencing sections by number. That's my biggest concern, so it seems like everything (will be) in order. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
