On 2010/07/13 15:02:56, Carl wrote:
On 2010/07/11 23:31:50, Neil Puttock wrote: > beam-type ?
I think not, because we're not talking about an argument to a function
call or
an entry in an alist here. We're talking about something that comes
from the
music. But I could be convinced otherwise.
I don't mind which, I was more concerned by the inconsistency: on the next line, it says beam-type (and you use beam-type in the @itemize block above, *before* you've presented the example for beaming rules which uses beam-type1, beam-type2 etc.) http://codereview.appspot.com/1682049/show _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
