Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> writes: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 09:08:35AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote: >> >> On 6/17/10 8:59 AM, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> > Moving existing Lilypond mode stuff into Emacs upstream will require >> > copyright assignments to the FSF. A fast hunch whether authors of the >> > current Lilypond mode can be determined with sufficient precision (for >> > legal accountability) and would be sympathetic to that, or whether I >> > should rather have to start from scratch? >> >> I would guess that authors can be determined, and that they would be >> sympathetic. > > My hunch is that authors can be determined, and the ones you can > contact would be sympathetic. However, my guess is that half the > authors of our Emacs stuff will not be contactable for various > reasons. > > I don't know how picky the FSF is about this,
Picky, if I want to get it into upstream Emacs. They've just set up a package repository for third-party stuff. Would be another option. > nor how important the existing work is. No good idea yet. The whole syntactic stuff I'd likely redo using newer facilities in order to get sane combined Scheme/Lilypond indentation and highlighting. Redoing compiling/viewing/keybindings might be somewhat pointless, in contrast. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
