On 13 April 2010 00:28, Richard Gay <richard....@t-online.de> wrote:

> Thanks again for your help. I quickly added a @knownissues to the docs
> of the feature and added your code from below as an example for a
> solution (if this is overkill, it's easily removed again).

No, that looks fine.

> I slightly modified the regression test for the lyric extender towards
> your example.

Can you change the docstring for this test so mentions extenders (just
to make it clear from the text what's being tested)?

> Even if I have to admit that I don't really understand it, this issue
> seems to be fixed by changing the patch as follows:

Good work!  It doesn't seem to break anything as far as I can tell (at
the very least, there are no regressions showing up).

Just a few more minor details to sort out, then it should be ready for pushing:

+...@lilypond[verbatim,ragged-right,quote]
+<<
+  \relative c' {
...
+>>

For the examples using \addlyrics, you can remove the << >> block (the
parser interprets the music + lyrics as simultaneous automatically).

+  c2 \grace { c16([ d e f] } g2) f1

newline before f1

+            (include_grace_notes && end_mom->grace_part_ > now.grace_part_))

indent

+          && dynamic_cast<Item *>(g)
+          && Note_head::has_interface(g))

space before (g)

Cheers,
Neil


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to