Sorry to reply only after providing a second version of the patch ... put the blame on my spam filter.
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:52:29 +0100, Graham Percival <[email protected]> wrote: > Wow, thanks! Especially for the doc parts. I can't speak to the > code, but there's a few doc policy issues. > > Also, could we get a regression test for this feature? See > input/regression/ Will work on that. > We try to avoid writing text like @code{includeGraceNotes} and > simply say "By default... when using @code{\lyricsto}, but this > behavior can be changed:" Apparently I used the wrong "template" for my doc part (namely, the ignoreMelismata setting). Will change this with the next version of the patch. > Another issue is that we try to avoid having tweaks in the main NR > text; these should be added as snippets. However, the rest of > Vocal music is a complete mess, and we don't have any doc editors > trained in dealing with snippets, so I'm fine with adding it to > the main text for now. Will change that, too. There even is a snippet "example" in vocal.itely which I will imitate. > > +...@lilypond[verbatim,ragged-right,quote] > > +<< > > + { > > + f'4 \appoggiatura b'32 c''4 > > + \grace { f'16 [a'16] } c''2 > > No tabs; indentation rule is two spaces per level. [...] Fixed that already in my second version of the patch. Thanks for the hint. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
