Oops, I forgot to put my policy hat on. I will fix things up.
As I looked, the main point I checked was that the drum clef and tab clef moved out of clefs and to the instrument-specific sections. I didn't check the other stuff. Again, I'm sorry about these mistakes. I'll fix it right now. Thanks, Carl On 1/30/10 9:38 PM, "Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > Carl, why did you push the recent change to Clef? > > 1. no contractions, please. I'm not convinced about the new > language there, anyway -- what about "(but are not required to > be)" ? > > 2. we have a policy of "show, don't tell". Why did we remove > \clef G, F, C from the example? > If there's a desire to emphasize the abbreviated nature -- and > really, "abbreviated" is not the right word, since G is not an > abbreviation of "treble" -- a comment in the @lilypond would do > this. > > 3. wrap lines at 72 chars, please. That's not always possible > with scheme code, but it's definitely doable with normal texinfo. > > 4. why remove the pointer to ancient notation? I remember > specifically discussing whether to include such > sentence-references, as opposed to a @seealso. > > ... oh wait, it's still there; I just couldn't see it due to the > long line. > > 5. don't refer to an "example above" if at all possible; the > referred format is "text, verbatim, image". I'm not conviced we > need to specifically need to mention g^8; I mean, we don't > specifically mention treble^8, do we? > > > Cheers, > - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
