Carl, why did you push the recent change to Clef? 1. no contractions, please. I'm not convinced about the new language there, anyway -- what about "(but are not required to be)" ?
2. we have a policy of "show, don't tell". Why did we remove \clef G, F, C from the example? If there's a desire to emphasize the abbreviated nature -- and really, "abbreviated" is not the right word, since G is not an abbreviation of "treble" -- a comment in the @lilypond would do this. 3. wrap lines at 72 chars, please. That's not always possible with scheme code, but it's definitely doable with normal texinfo. 4. why remove the pointer to ancient notation? I remember specifically discussing whether to include such sentence-references, as opposed to a @seealso. ... oh wait, it's still there; I just couldn't see it due to the long line. 5. don't refer to an "example above" if at all possible; the referred format is "text, verbatim, image". I'm not conviced we need to specifically need to mention g^8; I mean, we don't specifically mention treble^8, do we? Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
