Reinhold Kainhofer <reinh...@kainhofer.com> writes: > Am Samstag, 2. Januar 2010 00:35:16 schrieb Carl Sorensen: >> On 1/1/10 10:27 AM, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> > Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> writes: >> >> OK, point taken. I'll come up with a different name for the music >> >> function. Do you have any suggestions? >> >> >> >> How about \pushTimeSignatureSetting and \popTimeSignatureSetting? >> > >> > Since we can have a push without a pop, that makes a somewhat >> > uncomfortable pairing. >> >> Why is this more uncomfortable than override without a revert? > > Please don't use push/pop. These are computer science terms for > queues,
No, for stacks. And push without pop involves the picture of an imbalanced stack. It's like ending a book in a story within a story which ends without going back to the top level. Disconcerting. And yes, I know Shakespeare's Taming of the Shrew. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
