"Trevor Daniels" <t.dani...@treda.co.uk> writes: > For varying time signatures changes could still > be made via \overrideTimeSignatureSettings.
I consider it a grave user interface mistake to have some things work only with \overrideTimeSignatureSettings, but not with \override timeSignatureSettings. It is already bad enough that the completely arbitrary keyword/object relation override/revert->grob, set/unset->context is demanded from the user. Now introducing artificial phrases that use the verb "override" for operating on a context property is really going off the deep end. Why have \overrideTimeSignatureSettings when timeSignatureSettings is not to be associated with "override"? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel