Am Samstag, 2. Januar 2010 00:35:16 schrieb Carl Sorensen: > On 1/1/10 10:27 AM, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> writes: > >> OK, point taken. I'll come up with a different name for the music > >> function. Do you have any suggestions? > >> > >> How about \pushTimeSignatureSetting and \popTimeSignatureSetting? > > > > Since we can have a push without a pop, that makes a somewhat > > uncomfortable pairing. > > Why is this more uncomfortable than override without a revert?
Please don't use push/pop. These are computer science terms for queues, not terms any non-programmer would ever use or understand (to be honest, even I have to think twice which of the two appends to and which removes from the queue). Override/revert on the other hand are also used in colloquial language and so way easier to understand for non-programmers. Cheers, Reinhold -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
