On 2009/12/05 10:52:52, nicolas.sceaux wrote:
Le 5 déc. 2009 à 09:48, mailto:d...@gnu.org a écrit :
> Currently I don't see a better way forward than using a special
command
> line option, something like -dindex-markup on documentation runs. > If I get no objections, I'll try making a patch for that.
Using a LilyPond option was also what I was about to propose, so please go ahead.
Well, patch set 7 does that, but after rethinking this, I suppose I'd call it a mistake. Even if the option gets implemented for other constructs than markup, the time and memory savings are likely negligible. Checking for the option is likely causing more overhead than registering some markup. This would only start making sense if all other indexing operations (not just markup) were suppressed except on documentation runs. I don't think thta significant savings would be the result, and this would completely leave the scope of this particular patchset and its aim. So my take would be to apply patch set 6, and possibly file a TODO item "just index markup, macros, whatever on documentation runs" with low priority that may refer to this discussion and/or patch set 7. A complete job would have to mess with indexing in C code if I am not mistaken. And there is no sense in a half-baked job like that of patch set 7 since markup is just a small part of the job. http://codereview.appspot.com/160048
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
