Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> writes: > On 12/3/09 2:47 PM, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> There are patches that are "obviously right" and a direct >> improvement. If I had been in his place, I'd likely have committed a >> fix as well. I'd likely have used "make && make doc" before doing >> so, but I doubt I would have waited for a review to come in. > > make && make doc worked, because the snippet was still in the database > and not updated.
I was only talking about the commit that did not compile. The general functionality patch went through review AFAICS and was basically just "cosmetically" changed. Doesn't matter all too much, actually. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
