Le 13 déc. 2009 à 11:05, David Kastrup a écrit :
>> If in an existing score I later replace a q with an explicit chord all
>> the following q, qq and qqq will need changing too.
>
> Yes. But q, qq, and qqq are not intended for use all across the score,
> but rather in confined places. I am not sure that this is all too bad
> for writing. But I also am not sure that this is all too good for
> reading.
When used with parsimony, it can be helful, and not too bad for reading.
For instance, when there are loads of triplets like the following (I
faced that case a week ago, and was frustrated not being able to use q):
\times 2/3 { <c e> <d f> qq }
Also, it would solve the chords only vs. all notes issue. If it is
possible to refer to the two or three previous notes, then all chords and
simple notes (even rests: e.g. d4\rest) can be memorized.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
