Nicolas Sceaux <nicolas.sce...@gmail.com> writes:

> Le 12 déc. 2009 à 14:01, David Kastrup a écrit :
>> 
>> { G4 g D // | /// // / // | \time 3/4 G g / | D // // | /// // // | }
>
> Memorizing more than one chord/note (e.g. 3 chords/notes), and accessing
> them using q, qq, qqq, would do it?

Sure.  The slashes are, well, cute, but probably a mountain of slashes
like the above is not necessarily more readable.

The advantage of involving the parser is that one does know just how
much to memorize at most, and the memorization can be done by the parser
where it is easier to implement rigid and predictable rules (and avoid
input which just "happens to work" at one time and might break on
unrelated issues later).

-- 
David Kastrup


_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to