On 12/4/09 1:31 PM, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> writes:
>
>> On 12/4/09 12:02 PM, "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <hanw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> While having these explanations in mail is nice, it would be best to
>>> put as much of possible of these comments into the code.
>>
>> Understood.
>>
>> When I see David's suggestions, I'll make sure it gets commented.
>
> I just came home and have to go to bed now. I'll write code tomorrow
> that reflects the logic of your description and embeds it as well. And
> some part of it probably will have to go into CG or similar, too.
>
I've put a new patch set (Set 3) that makes use of the updating in the for
loop, as David suggested.
I've eliminated the code that added the difference in script_priority values
and just use a constant bump in outside_script_priority, which makes the
code cleaner.
I've also added comments to try to capture the intent.
Reviews are welcome.
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
