On 12/4/09 12:02 PM, "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <hanw...@gmail.com> wrote: > While having these explanations in mail is nice, it would be best to > put as much of possible of these comments into the code. Understood. When I see David's suggestions, I'll make sure it gets commented. Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
- PATCH: Refactor script-column.cc for improved reading a... Carl Sorensen
- Re: PATCH: Refactor script-column.cc for improved ... David Kastrup
- Re: PATCH: Refactor script-column.cc for impro... Trevor Daniels
- Re: PATCH: Refactor script-column.cc for i... David Kastrup
- Re: PATCH: Refactor script-column.cc for i... Reinhold Kainhofer
- Re: PATCH: Refactor script-column.cc for impro... Carl Sorensen
- Re: PATCH: Refactor script-column.cc for i... Han-Wen Nienhuys
- Re: PATCH: Refactor script-column.cc f... Carl Sorensen
- Re: PATCH: Refactor script-column... David Kastrup
- Re: PATCH: Refactor script-co... Carl Sorensen
- Re: PATCH: Refactor scrip... Carl Sorensen
- Re: PATCH: Refactor script-column.cc for i... Trevor Daniels
- Re: PATCH: Refactor script-column.cc f... David Kastrup
- Re: PATCH: Refactor script-column... Carl Sorensen
- Re: PATCH: Refactor script-column.cc f... Carl Sorensen
- Re: PATCH: Refactor script-column... Trevor Daniels
- Re: PATCH: Refactor script-co... Carl Sorensen