On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 07:57:26PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: > On Sunday 23 August 2009 02:16:15 Carl Sorensen wrote: > > Yes, we should call it \newcresc, and indicate in the documentation > > that \cresc is deprecated. ... > So,for now I would simply apply that patch so that the properties get > interpreted, but don't add a new command, which will be changed in the > next version again. Anyone who whats to use them (basically, that's me > for now),can always write our own mycresc or even overload the existing > cresc command as postfix.
This sounds very sensible to me. Now, to forstall any complaints that new features shouldn't be demonstrated in input/regression/, could you copy that regtest into Documentation/snippets/new/ ? With a warning that the new \cresc won't be integrated until 3.0, redefine at your own risk, etc. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
