On 8/22/09 5:13 PM, "Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 02:24:22PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> On 8/22/09 11:34 AM, "Reinhold Kainhofer" <reinh...@kainhofer.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Graham does not want any syntax changes prior to 2.14, so this won't go into
>>> spanner-init.ly. But these three definitions is all that is to be said about
>>> the frontend....
>>
>> No, syntax changes are allowed in 2.13. It is *stable* (2.12) that could
>> have no syntax changes.
>
> Yes, with the possible exception of changes that require manual
> attention. IMO, if we're going to eliminate all prefix notation,
> then we should do that all at once (in 3.0), instead of piecemeal.
>
> If this change uses \newcr or \crnew or whatever, then fine. If
> it redefines the behavior of \cresc, then I recommend caution.
Yes, we should call it \newcresc, and indicate in the documentation that
\cresc is deprecated.
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
