Graham Percival schrieb:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 08:51:42PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Carl Sorensen wrote Wednesday, August 12, 2009 7:32 PM
And if we're ever going to move it to a postfix operator (which is one
of
the goals of the GLISS project), now is the time, before we get a
strong
codebase of music function applications.
Yes, this is planned. It's been on my list of discussions to
introduce when the website/build stuff is finished, for about two
months now.
Sorry to interrupt, but what's wrong with prefix notation?
I mean, we code and read music from left to right, so
it seems nore natural to me to have the command changing
the behaviour of a note in front of it.
Yes, I assume, every parser constructor will condemn me for this,
but for readability, a line like
c4 harmonic: d e f (without a leading backslash!)
is easier to understand than
c4 d\harmonic e f
Again, I don't think this is the right time to introduce this
discussion, but I guess we could do so anyway.
Yes, that's right.
Marc
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
