On 9 Aug 2009, at 18:53, David Kastrup wrote:
Dan Eble <d...@faithful.be> writes:
On 9 Aug 2009, at 18:21, Mark Polesky wrote:
Dan Eble wrote:
I appreciate your reply. Applying this statement to certain
other figures (e.g. key signature or clef) would indicate a bug.
Does a non-functional bar line differ from those?
I wouldn't apply that statement to other figures. This is a
specific behavior of the \bar command.
OK, but what I was trying to ask is, is it a *correct* behavior of
the
\bar command? Saying that something is so differs from saying that it
should be so.
For \bar "", it is probable sensible behavior. For visible bar
lines, I
feel hard put to feel the same.
Agreed about invisible bars, but maybe with the additional restriction
that there is no line break. If a conductor told you to start at the
second line of this piece, would you end up embarrassed? (If not,
what if the break were a page turn?)
\version "2.12.1"
\include "english.ly"
\relative c''
{
\key g \minor
c4 c b \bar "" \break b | c1
}
--
Dan
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
