Dan Eble <d...@faithful.be> writes: > On 9 Aug 2009, at 18:21, Mark Polesky wrote: > >> Dan Eble wrote: >>> I appreciate your reply. Applying this statement to certain >>> other figures (e.g. key signature or clef) would indicate a bug. >>> Does a non-functional bar line differ from those? >> >> I wouldn't apply that statement to other figures. This is a >> specific behavior of the \bar command. > > OK, but what I was trying to ask is, is it a *correct* behavior of the > \bar command? Saying that something is so differs from saying that it > should be so.
For \bar "", it is probable sensible behavior. For visible bar lines, I feel hard put to feel the same. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
