>> For Mozart, the stroke should perhaps a bit shorter -- maybe two >> different symbols? > > Attached are two samples for long and short strokes with varying > width. The long strokes have height = staff_space, the shorter ones > height = 0.8*staff_space (is that a reasonable choice?). Each file > contains strokes of each type with ten different widths, namely > i*0.05*staff_space, for i=1,..,10. Which do you prefer? I tend to > lean towards #4 for the shorter ones and #4 or #5 for the longer > ones, but that's just my personal aesthetics.
I don't have an opinion yet. Reason: The thicker the shape in your PDF, the less rounded are the corners -- this distorts the stroke too much IMHO to find a reasonable variant. I suggest to use the `minus' glyph as a template w.r.t. the round corners. > I'd be happy about opinions from you guys because I have never seen > this symbol in a real score and am simply trying to provide the > code. You can look up the whole Neue Mozart-Ausgabe (NMA) online: http://dme.mozarteum.at Werner _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
