2009/3/1 Frédéric Bron <frederic.b...@m4x.org>: > Well thank you. I have downloaded your score and found \ind and \nind > but both start on the next note. However, I like the syntax \ind > #"cresc poco a poco". It is a bit more painful than what I propose > \<"cresc poco a poco" but it can be done today without changing the > parser.
No, that is not what I have in mind. Actually, I was more referring to Graham's compound dynamics that (through the use of 'tweaks) are attached _after_ the note, such as c'\flegato I have written something like that for text spanners too, but (see below). > I have also seen that you do quite often such thing: > > c\ff \dim c c c\! I do not. I only use \< and \> 2009/3/1 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>: > Yes. I think that somebody (a Frog?) would need to make \cresc a > built-in command rather than simply being defined in > ly/spanner-init.ly (or maybe dynamics-init.ly ?) No, actually I have been thinking about this and here's what I'd propose. The mail problem with using the 'tweaks method is that you can't pass the text as an argument; you have to first define a meta-function, then define all your strings as follows: flegato = #(make-extra-dynamic "f" "legato") and so on. What I'd really like to see implemented is an equivalent of define-music-function, but that would instead be called define-music-tweak, that could take any argument (strings, numbers, whatever) /except/ music expressions, and that would be entered immediately /after/ the affected note (like an articulation), whereas music-functions have to be entered /before/ the note they affect (that's actually a ly:music? argument). I don't know if I'm making myself clear. And FWIW, I doubt any Frog could implement such a new infrastructure. I certainely can not. Regards, Valentin _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
