> I wrote something like this for my opera, using the 'tweaks acons > method. I'll see if I can find it back.
Well thank you. I have downloaded your score and found \ind and \nind but both start on the next note. However, I like the syntax \ind #"cresc poco a poco". It is a bit more painful than what I propose \<"cresc poco a poco" but it can be done today without changing the parser. I have also seen that you do quite often such thing: c\ff \dim c c c\! which is what you think (dim starts after \ff) but which does not what you really want: \dim c\ff c c c\! Because \dim starts on the next note, you have to put it before \ff which is the contrary of what happens really! If you put \dim after \ff, the "dim" starts on the next note and it is possible that the "ff" and the "dim" are not put on the same line. This illustrates perfectly why I would like that \cresc and \dim start on the next note. F. Bron _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
