2007/9/10, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'd certainly say so... but there's a large element of "the customer is > always right" here. > > The all-in-one HTML page is **5 megs**. I'm astounded that so many > people (ie more than 0) are choosing to download that monster _every > time_ they want to look something up in the docs. That's a terrible > waste of bandwidth, especially if you consider that the answer they're > looking for is probably 1k of text and 100k of example picture. To me, > that sounds like a terrible indictment of how badly organized the docs are.
...Or how badly we need an integrated search tool. > Let me phrase this question differently: > - if you currently use the all-in-one HTML page, how could we organize > the non-all-in-one docs such that you use them? I'm absolutely fine with the one-tiny-subsection-per-page. *I* like the current layout. > Remember that you can search the docs online as part of LSR. Yes, but I think this should definitely be implemented on lilypond.org itself. Regards, Valentin _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
