Le lundi 10 septembre 2007 à 08:00 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit : > To summarize some discussions: > - there seems to be considerable dislike for the current > "one-short-subsection-per-HTML-page" layout of the manual. That > surprises me, since I've never had a problem with it, but of course I'm > intimately familiar with the layout of the manual, so I'm happy to > disregard my own opinion in this matter. > > - Does anybody _like_ the current layout? If so, speak up now or > forever hold your peace. :) > > > There are two solutions for this: > 1) Don't split HTML by into subsections; have one html page per section. > > 2) Merge many subsections. For example, > 6.1 Pitches > 6.1.1 Writing pitches (includes 6.1.1, 6.1.2, 6.1.3, 6.1.4, and 6.1.5 > in the latest proposal) > 6.1.2 Octaves/jumping pitches (includes 6.1.6, 6.1.7, and 7.1.8) > 6.1.3 Rests (includes 6.1.9 and 6.10) > > the names obviously need work. > > > My preference is for 2 -- I can't believe that users want to see > articulations, dynamics, and trills on the same HTML page. But as I > said, we should probably disregard my opinion on this issue.
I vote for option 2 too, as it's a better compromise between easier full text search and load time when reading docs online. John _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
