On Monday 10 September 2007, Graham Percival wrote: > Kieren MacMillan wrote: > > Hi Reinhold, > > > >> They are all ornaments to a note. > > > > At the very least, there are more (and more complex) things you can do > > with dynamics (in Lilypond), and so that section alone would be long > > enough to deserve its own HTML page. > > I'd certainly say so... but there's a large element of "the customer is > always right" here. > > The all-in-one HTML page is **5 megs**. I'm astounded that so many > people (ie more than 0) are choosing to download that monster _every > time_ they want to look something up in the docs. That's a terrible > waste of bandwidth, especially if you consider that the answer they're > looking for is probably 1k of text and 100k of example picture. To me, > that sounds like a terrible indictment of how badly organized the docs are. > > > Let me phrase this question differently: > - if you currently use the all-in-one HTML page, how could we organize > the non-all-in-one docs such that you use them? > > Remember that you can search the docs online as part of LSR.
What about creating a 'lilypond documentation search' plugin for Firefox Search Bar? It could either use the LSR search, or google (using site:http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/Documentation/). This would be a useful application of the search bar, IMHO. Erik _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
