On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 8:37 AM Giacomo Catenazzi <c...@debian.org> wrote:
> But a standard is much more then just API and structures. As we learned:
> "nobody can build a network stack just reading RFC, without looking BSD
> code", for this reason "reference implementation" is important (and part
> of the original question),
But please note that the elements of the reference implementation that *must
be copied in order to interoperate *are not themselves copyrightable.
Indeed, programmers seem to believe that their code is uniformly
copyrightable. In fact you can copyright some pieces of your code. A lot
less than most people think.
> but also text and rationale.
And this brings us back to the fact that the text of the standard can be
copyrighted as the text of a standard, but the software implementation,
unless it somehow reproduces large swathes of the rationale, would not be
infringing of it. And of course said swathes could be stripped out.
> We can look at Unicode Standard: the text is much more than just a
> standard, it has a lot of linguistic and stylistic works.
All of which has the most dubious of copyrightability, due to its purpose
being entirely functional.
So, I understand Nate's purpose. I don't believe the law will be of much
help to him in it, though. And the issuance of a specialized license for
the standard will mainly have the effect of fooling others into the belief
that it can be enforced. Or worse - convincing courts that this is the new
norm and that it *should *be enforced. This is the main reason that I
objected to Open Hardware licenses. We had so much to lose if courts
started to believe that they *should *be enforced. Imagine if every
schematic in every electronics book had an enforceable copyright that
governed the *implementation. *It would greatly hobble the field.
Thanks
Bruce
_______________________________________________
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not
necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the
Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
